Multi-Attribute Decision Making using Hybrid Approach based on Benefit-Cost Model for Sustainable Fashion

Adriyendi Adriyendi; Yeni  Melia

doi:10.25008/ijadis.v2i1.1200

Authors

Adriyendi Adriyendi Informatics Group, IAIN Batusangkar, Indonesia
Yeni Melia Informatics Group, IAIN Batusangkar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25008/ijadis.v2i1.1200

Keywords:

Multi-attribute decision making, Benefit-cost, Sustainable fashion, Hybrid approach, Clothing

Abstract

Multi-Attribute Decision Making (MADM) is used to select the best alternative from multi-alternatives based on multi-attribute (fashion material) and multi-criteria (sustainable fashion). Multi-alternatives are cotton, linen, silk, wool, acrylic, nylon, polyester, rayon, spandex, and mixed. Multi-attributes are material, texture, color, characteristic, comfort, and wearability. Multi-criteria are material fiber, smooth texture, faded color, elastic clothing, useful long, chilly and comfortable. Hybrid approaches and optimal solutions are needed to determine the best choice in decision making for both producers and consumers. The hybrid approach in MADM used is Simple Multi-Attribute Rating (SMART), Multi-Factor Evaluation Process (MFEP), Multi-Object Optimization based on Ratio Analysis (MOORA), Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), and Weighted Product (WP). SMART and MFEP are based on the Non-Benefit Cost Model while MOORA, SAW, and WP are based on a Benefit-Cost Model. The experimental results show that the SMART model with the best alternative is the rayon with the highest value (2.8333). The selection of the MFEP Model with the best alternative is rayon with the highest value (2.8330). The choice of MOORA model with the best alternative is rayon with the highest value (0.2595). The selection of the SAW Model with the best alternative is rayon with the highest value (0.8932). The selection of the WP Model with the best alternative is rayon with the highest value (0.1285). MADM using SMART, MFEP, MOORA, SAW, and WP for sustainable fashion yields the best alternative for consumption and production for the middle-class population in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

F. Harris, H. Roby, & S. Dibb, "Sustainable Clothing: Challenges, Barriers and Interventions for Encouraging more Sustainable Consumer Behaviour," International Journal of Consumer Studies, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 309-318, 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12257

Adriyendi, "Fuzzy Logic using Tsukamoto Model and Sugeno Model on Prediction Cost," International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 13-21, Jun 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijisa.2018.06.02

A. Qastarin & M. C. A. Siagian, "Organza Exploration as the Main Material in Party Dress Design," e-Proceedings of Art & Design, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 273-293, 2019.

W. Hadikurniawati, E. Winarno, T. D. Cahyono, & D. Abdullah, "Comparison of AHP-TOPSIS Hybrid Methods, WP, and SAW for Multi-Attribute Decision-Making to Select the Best Electrical Expert," IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1114,pp. 1-12, 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1114/1/012100

A. B. Marendra, D. Nugroho, & I. A. Prabowo, "Classification of Futsal Players uses the Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique Method," Journal of TIKomSiN, vol. 6, no. 2, 22-30, Oct 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.30646/tikomsin.v6i2.377

R. Sulaehani, "Application of the Multifactor Evaluation Process Method in the Decision Support System for Providing Family Latrine Aid at Dulomo Village office," Tecnoscienza, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 161-176, Apr 2019.

E. G. Genc & O. D. Basar, "Comparison of Country Ratings of Credit Rating Agencies with MOORA Method," Business and Economics Research Journal, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 391-404, 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.20409/berj.2019.175

F. B. Hartono & H. J. Prasetyo, "Decision Support System using the Simple Additive Weighting Method to Determine the Superior Products in Mount of Kidul Regency," Journal of Teknika, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1071-1076, 2019. https://doi.org/10.30736/jt.v11i1.289

Mujahidin, A. B. Purba & T. Agustian, " Implementation of the Weighted Product Method in Decision Support Systems for the Production of Not Good Materials (ng). ILKOM Journal of Scientific, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 25-33, Apr 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.33096/ilkom.v11i1.388.25-33

R. Y. Hayuningtyas, "Application of Naïve Bayes Algorithm for Recommended Women's Clothing," Journal of Informatics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 8-22, Apr 2019. Retrieved from http:// ejournal. bsi.ac.id/ ejurnal/index.php/ji/article/view/4685 https://doi.org/10.31311/ji.v6i1.4685

Y. Nuriyati, & O. O. Sharif, "Analysis of Customer Value Index in Choosing Women's Clothing Attributes in Indonesia. e-Proceeding of Management, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 106-114, 2019.

R. Rachman, "Application of the AHP Method to Determine the Quality of Apparel in the Garment Industry," Journal of Informatics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-8, 2019. Retrieved from http://ejournal.bsi.ac.id /ejurnal/ index.php/ji/article/view/4389 https://doi.org/10.31311/ji.v6i1.4389

J. Kittur, "Optimal Generation Evaluation using SAW, WP, AHP, and Promethee Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques," IEEE Intl. Conf. on Technological Advancements in Power & Energy, pp. 304-309, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAPENERGY.2015.7229636

S. Khadarlina, "Decision Support System for Coastal Tourist Area Sustainability using Mfep and Smart Methods," Thesis, Tanjung Pinang, Informatics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Raja Ali Haji Maritime University. Retrieved Jun 2019

Adriyendi "Multi-Attribute Decision Making using Simple Additive Weighting and Weighted Product in Food Choice," International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business,vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 8-12, Nov 2015. doi: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijieeb.2015.06.02

H. Priatna, Dedih, & J. Mulyana, "Comparison of Smart and SAW Methods in Determining Web-based Permanent Employees. UNSIKA Syntax Journal of Informatics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 53-85, 2016.

A. K. Vadreas, R. Turaina, & S. Ardiansyah, "Decision Support System for Determining Housing Development Funds is not Egible by using the Mfep Method. Journal of TEKNOIF, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 18-23, Apr 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.21063/JTIF.2018.V6.1.18-23

Ramadiani, F. P. K. Rani, D. M. Khairina, & H. R. Hatta, "Decision Support System by using the Moora Method for Pandega Scout Selection," Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 899-906, 2019. doi:http://0.25126/jtiik.201961284

V. Amalia, D. Syamsuar, & L. Atika, "Comparison of WP, SAW, and WASPAS in Determining Scholarship Recipients Tracking Interests and Capabilities," Informatika Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 114-121, 2019. Retrieved from http://ejournal.bsi.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/ji/article/view/5511 https://doi.org/10.31311/ji.v6i1.5511

S. R. Arifin & J. S. Mintamanis, Josua Crishan, "Decision Support System for Determining Thesis Supervisior using a Weighted Product Method," JOIN (Journal Online Informatika), vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 80-85, Dec 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.15575/join.v3i2.230

C.E. Henninger, P. J. Alevizou, & C. J. Oates, "What is sustainable Fashion?," Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 1-22, 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-07-2015-0052

R. Rachmat and S. Suhartono, "Comparative Analysis of Single Exponential Smoothing and Holt’s Method for Quality of Hospital Services Forecasting in General Hospital", Bulletin of Comp. Sci. & Electr. Eng., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 80–86, Aug. 2020. https://doi.org/10.25008/bcsee.v1i2.8